unoriginal

När tidsuret vände, när det sista sandkornet slog sig in bland resterande sandkorn, i en blandning av en oblanding. Samma bruna yta med samma innehåll. När blatten tog talespråket litterärt och blev den han ville vara, den som hade makt, pengar och horor som ett resultat av mer erkännande än jobb. När något högkulturellt beblandades med inkomstsmöjligheter. När man kidnappade henne, klädde av henne, våldtog henne, tog hennes heder och sålde henne tillbaka till den ursprungliga källans nya generation.

När hiphop dog.

/Unoriginal

Talk turns cheap when the export exceeds the demand, and nobody would invest in your words nor buy them. You don't project a steady growth, your ideas used to be cash cows, when people believed in anything, now you're just a left over, a bi-product to an elder tool of working manipulation and income. Like anything else your ideas have a life cycle on the market, and the death valley curve has already been surpassed, you are now dead.

/Unoriginal

As we suffice we realise our limits are potential threats to our goals; the thirsty rebellion makes the melody, through the loud voice of insanity and common insecurity, the land of no man, the continious struggle to validate the existance of such a phenomenon that is us today, with thoughts of change for tomorrow. Striving for the left overs while the rest's striving for the next goal, watching you picking pockets in their back mirrors annoyed and frustrated over your ambition to suffice, to become equals and nothing more. Yet you keep crawling, saluting your ancestors, you keep crawling and searching for crums known as equality. The mentality of searching for crums is in the culture you carry, your children will, if not assimilated, carry the same goals and their children will as well. Crawl for crums, never to reach beyond, always behind, crawling for crums.

Biji yourself and make your noise while the memory of you perish, because it will perish, as your body crawls.

/ Unoriginal

He told me to reminiss with a state of mind, punch the big apple in this state of time,
Through lines portraying crimes to the simple minds, spits to give sight to a world that's blind,
Learned to keep awake till the day I die, the endless sleep over hives, death's related tide,
Told me life's a bitch but that this bitch is mine, so keep it real, pack the steel, and get high,
One time for your mind, one time, kick the fucking rhyme, what up son whatever like it's clever,
Lost through ounces but we couldn't even bother, never sober, untill it was written to give us power,
Understood that he knew us, lived through us, grew us up with blessed liquid of conscious rulers,
To leave the rest in the commersial sewers, overpopulated by rat rulers, came back to undo us,
plagued us to blind our taste through curse, most intellectuals half listening made it work.

- Hiphop just died this morning and she's dead, she's dead.

Ni omger mig, statiska och förankrade i en imaginär verklighet. Ni beskyller mig, ni hånar mig, ni ser ner på mig. När jag bryter ett befintligt tankemönster till förmån för ett nytt avfärdar ni mig. Ni, som lever i ett skyddsnät - gudsnät - begränsade i era förutsättningar att påverka, bidra och utveckla. Ni forcerar er tygel över mig, ni minimerar min betydelse och spelroll till förmån för er Gud. Ni kan inte acceptera eran egen betydelse och minimerar således min. Ni, som skapat misär, begränsat begär, fört vidare bristande gener och anlete. Vad har ni att erbjuda mig? Förvandlad till en enstöring, vägval har jag men ingen väg ut, vart jag än hamnar finns ni där - i erat elände.

/Unoriginal

Alliansen utrikespolitik är entydig, man vill bland annat in i Nato successivt och ge nationen Turkiet en plats i EU. Samtidigt har man personer, främst Malm, som för en intern opposition mot en liten del av bland annat utrikespolitiken och främst förtrycket mot kurder. Hur fungerar egentligen detta, är alliansen splittrat? Utåt nej, det är en allt för liten fråga för att skapa den bilden, det har nämligen alltid funnits meningskiljaktighet utåt inom politiska partier i, enligt det omgivande samhället, småfrågor. Den kurdiska frågan är ingen prioritet, men kurder utgör en del av invånarna i samhället, att uppröra denna minoritet kan lätt leda till förlorade röster. Hur behåller man då en minoritetsgrupp man aktivt arbetar emot som röstare hos det egna partiet?

För att enklare förstå fenomenet kan jag dra en parallell till det amerikanska folket, ett land som är i krig i Irak men som har invånare som protesterar mot kriget. Detta trivs landet med då det skapar en mildare bild utåt, utan dessa demonstranter skulle USA's folk bli hatade, och inte enbart regeringen. Demonstranterna är enkla brickor som är nödvändiga för landets bild utåt, samtidigt som man krigar och exploaterar sin omvärld. Det mildrar hatet. Och denna princip tillämpas överallt i olika avseenden.

Fredrik Malm är en billig och enkel bricka, en skenfigur, med största sannolikhet omedveten om det själv. Alliansen välkomnar hans, och andras, kritik med öppna armar. Genom interpellationsdebatter och andra PR-evenemang. Samtidigt som kurder förhåller sig kritiskt till alliansen finns Malm där, som stödjer sin allians med samtidigt avviker i sakfrågan om kurder, vilket i sin tur gör att många kurdiska röster behålls inom alliansen. Man mildar upp hatet bland kurderna genom att ha figurer som figurerar i favör för deras åsikter, men som ändå tillhör ett parti med en helt annan åsikt och vägval. En hel partiallians, som utåt lider av en gemensam kognitiv dissonans men utan biverkningar. Hur genialt är inte detta?

"Vi säger en sak, men gör en annan".

/Unoriginal

Introduction: The kafirs are tribal people of the mountains. These people's territory, in the Hindu-Kush, was once far greater than it is today. Now they inhabit a small area in northern Pakistan, Close to the Afghani border. In Past years the Kafirs only inhabit three valleys in this region, the valleys of Bumboret, Birir and Rumbur in Chitral.
Due to their isolation from outside influences they are the only non-Muslim tribe in central Asia. One of the peculiar things is that their ancestries are fiercely debated.
There are many theories but no one seems to really know where they came from?
How did they end up here, in these valleys?

They are one of today's most endangered minorities, constantly pressured by the surrounding Islamic population to convert from their Hellenic religion to Islam. Due to their century's long isolation from outside influences they are the only non-Muslim group of people in central Asia.
This has earned them the name Kafir, an Arabic word meaning "infidels" or "non-Muslim". Unfortunately the neighbouring Islamic population has historically harassed them. In 1320 A.D the Kalasha were forced into a massive Islamic conversion, one of many. About 570 years later, in 1895, yet another conversion took place lead by Amir Abdul Rahman Khan. "Amir" is an epithet given to the king, or leader, of those parts.
At present time the kafirs are still rapidly decreasing in numbers. In 1952 this minority accounted for 10 000 inhabitants, later in 1998 there hade been a significant change.
Numbers had diminished to only about 4000 individuals.
These people's territory, situated in the Hindi-Kush, was once far greater than it is today, now they inhabit only three valleys placed, in Chitral, on the mountainous border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The tribe is traditionally divided into two fractions, the Kalasha and the Nuristani (Also known as just Nuri or Kati).
The Kalasa or the Black kafirs inhabit Chitral an area located in Pakistan's northern territories, the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). Whilst the Nuristani or the Red Kafirs occupy a region formerly known as Kafiristan "land of Infidels". But after this fraction was forced to convert into Islam in 1895 the regions name was changed to Nuristan, Arabic for "Enlightment" or "Land of Enlightment". Because of the Nuristanis conversion they no longer can be called "Kafirs". Though the appellation is still used upon the Kalasha tribe; something they feel is humiliation.
Mullahs from nearby villages tend to pressure the Kalasha into converting to Islam. Unfortunately, for the obtainment of the Kalasha culture, conversion is no rarity.
Mostly men convert, not because they choose to follow the way of the Quran, but rather because their employment is hard to come by. This causes most inhabitants to live in outermost poverty. Due to racial discrimination men who believe in the Kalasha religion are not given work in neighbouring villages. Muslim men however have an easier time.
This is causing the Halasha tradition to quickly deteriorate. In the three Kalasha valleys where only one madras, a religious Islamic school were the Quran is taught, could previously be found, there are now 16. The Islamic way of life is penetrating the Kalasha community. In these parts the war in Afghanistan is frequently remembered. The Kalasha share their valleys not only with local Muslims but also Afghani refugees who have fled the ongoing war. One example is that the madrasas, in the area, are recruiting grounds for armed forces to be sent into Afghanistan to fight with the Taliban. The talibanization is said to be crushing the Kalashas fragile culture, their delicate existents.
The Kalasha culture were they belive in Hellenic gods is not the only factor that separates the Kalash from their neighbours. The split can also be seen in their physical appearance. They have, opposed to other tribes in the area, light skin blue/green eyes light hair and regular features and they are of average height.
Modern Greeks are convinced that the Kalasha are their ancient relatives. Ismalic fundamentalists just wish that the "infidels" would convert to the "proper" religion and that they should "get a job". The modern greek government has an immense interest in the tribe. They have sent reinforcements to the valleys of Bumboret, Birir and Rumbur, in Chitral. The Greeks are builing up the community. Schools and houses are being built as well as they are sending economic support.
Where does this tribe originate? One of the most popular theories is that the Kalasha and Nuristanis are descendants of Alexander the Greats armies. It is said that when Alexander the Great occupied the region his soldiers married local women and started families. This explanation is believed to be the right one according to the Nuristanis, the Kalash chooses to believe otherwise, they claim to come from Tsiam, a spiritual home.
They claim that they are descendents from the Kurds. The Kurds in their turn believe that their ancestors are soldiers from Alexander the Greats Army. Apparently the two minorities have much in common. Like the Kalsha, the Kurds also have an Aryan apperance, they are also mountainous people as well as goat herders.

Tänker nedan lista lite kortfattade förklaringar till varför det inte har blivit så mycket bloggande på sistone:

1. Jag är lat.
2. Har fullt upp.
3. Ingen motivation, vill inte blogga utan motivation, det blir bara slampigt och ointressant. Inte för att jag har någonting emot slampighet, tvärt om.
4. Centralstimulerande substanser är roligare.
5. Eh, ptja, jag lirar hellre datorspel.

/ Unoriginal

The following is supposedly an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different Religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over. So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you", and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct... ... leaving only Heaven thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."

THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY A

/ Unoriginal

Blanda en apa med en hund, vad får du? Antagligen Bill O'Reily, inga svårigheter där. En enkel skärningspunkt. Vad får man om man blandar ihop ateism med en religiöst fundamental stat? I den här videon så exemplifierar amerikanerna hur dumma majoriteten egentligen är, och nej, det är ingen obefogad fördom. Den högerkonservativa Bill O'Reily är ett språkrör för en hel skara Bush-anhängare som är en majoritet av befolkningen med störst mängd i inceststaten Texas. Varav 80% representerar hans tittarsiffror (resterande 20% består av komedifans). Vi kan således med hjälp av bland annat uteslutningsmetoden konstatera att han representerar majoriteten. Men nog om det. O'Reily försöker i klippet lista upp onda ateister varav en av dessa inte var ateist och peka på deras illdåd, han påpekar direkt efter det att Sir Dawkins kan referera till Al Qaida (propaganda?) och att han är medveten om det. Nej, herr O'Reily, låt oss istället peka på KKK, NRA samt din regering. Det intressanta här är inte det faktum att O'Reilys retoriska förmåga vore i samma klass som en guldfisk om det inte var för att han kan skrika högre, nej, det intressanta här är hur amerikaner målar upp ateister som djävulens anhängare. O'Reily tar även upp att Sverige har flest ateister i världen. Notera i videon att man har skrivit ateist som titel ovanför Dawkins namn när man kunde ha valt författare, forskare, professor mm. Propaganda? Judge for yourself.




/ Unoriginal